As soon
as Alexander Fleming accidentally discovered the medicinal benefit of
antibiotics, bacteria began fighting back.
Penicillin appeared as the kind of “magic bullet” Paul Ehrlich
envisioned, but the ability of microbes to evolve resistance mechanisms has led
to an evolutionary and pharmacological arms race over the last century. Antibiotics attack susceptible bacteria
through specific mechanisms based on the cellular and metabolic differences
between prokaryotes and eukaryotes. One
class of antibiotics, the tetracyclines, prevents the synthesis of new proteins
by binding to the bacterial ribosomes.
Unfortunately, the bacteria responded by modifying their ribosomes and
pumping the antibiotic out of the cell.1 Tigecycline, a glycycline built of the
tetracycline scaffold, possesses a unique functional group that allows it to
block the bacterial ribosome and simultaneously evade bacterial resistance
mechanisms.2 Developed under
the name GAR-936 by Wyeth Pharmaceuticals in Philadelphia, tigecycline (brand
name: Tygacil) provides a new weapon in the rapidly changing battle of
antibacterial resistance.
As a new
tetracycline, tigecycline uses the same mechanism of action of its tetracycline
ancestors – preventing protein synthesis.
Invading bacteria require new proteins to survive, which are made by
ribosomes. A copy of the genetic
information is transcribed into an RNA message that can be translated by a
ribosome. During the translational
process, the mRNA feeds between the two subunits presenting the codon that determines
the appropriate amino acid to be added to the growing peptide chain. The transfer RNA (tRNA) with the correct
anticodon enters into the A-site with the specified amino acid. From here, the amino-acyl-tRNA pivots to the
P-site for the peptidyl-transfer reaction.2 After attaching, the tRNA slides to the
E-site and ejects from the ribosome as a new aminoacyl-tRNA enters to continue
the elongation of the peptide chain.
Tetracyclines
and tigecycline specifically target the 30S subunit of the bacterial ribosome
by binding reversibly to the A-site, and preventing the accommodation of the
tRNA.3 Within the 30S
subunit, tetracylines interfere with the H34 helical region of the 16S rRNA
through hydrogen bonds between the hydrophilic parts of the drug and the
phosphate backbone. The resulting steric
hindrance prevents aminoacyl-tRNA from pivoting to the P-site and blocks the
elongation of the peptide chain. While
tetracyclines bind to the subunit in one direction, tigecycline blocks the
A-site although through a different orientation. This unique binding increases
tigecycline’s affinity almost 5-fold giving the antibiotic its bacteriostatic
properties and a method of circumventing the resistance proteins in some
strains of bacteria.2
All
antibiotic products face the challenge of bacterial resistance. Formerly susceptible bacterial strains employ
two major resistance mechanisms against tetracycline antibiotics. First, bacteria up-regulate efflux pumps to
expel the harmful antibiotics from the cell before it can perform its
inhibitory activity. When Gram-negative
bacteria encounter a tetracycline product, efflux genes known in sequence as TetA-E turn on to a decrease the
concentration of drug within the cell.
Gram-positive bacteria remove tetracyclines through the same efflux
process, but with the genes TetG-L. These gram-positive bacteria also produce
extra small proteins that block the location of tetracycline binding through
the genes TetM or TetO.1,4 The protective proteins compete with the
tetracycline and reduce the effectiveness of the drug. Researchers designed tigecycline with the
intention of avoiding the Tet efflux
pumps by including a bulky side chain that would stay in the cell to continue
working, but they also found that it continued to work in the presence TetM proteins
During
development in the early 1990’s, tigecycline became the main focus of a new
antibiotic class of glycyclines that retained the ribosome blocking mechanisms
of tetracycline but avoided the evolved Tet
resistance.4 Starting with
tetracycline’s four-ring structure, researchers developed new generations of
antibiotics by attaching various functional groups to evade efflux and avoid TetM
proteins. For example, doxycycline moves
a hydroxyl group from the C-ring to the B-Ring, while minocycline includes a
dimethylamine to the 7-position on the D-ring.
Minocycline proved to be a strong antibiotic,
but eventually succumbed to similar mechanisms of resistance. Researchers attempted to improve minocycline
by including a new functional group to C-9 position of the D-ring. An early glycycline,
dimethylglycylamido-minocycline (DMG-MINO) provided a hopeful avenue, but tigecycline
showed the most promise against the more clinically relevant, multidrug
resistant pathogens.5,6 Structurally, tigecycline, a chemical
descendant of minocycline, adds a tert-butyl-glycylamido group to the D-Ring,
which provides the anti-resistance benefits while maintaining antibacterial
properties with three main improvements.
First, the molecule became more lipophilic allowing for easier transport
into the cell. Because tetracyclines act
on ribosomes, they must reach the cytosol to perform their inhibitory
mechanisms. The additional side chain
increases tigecycline’s volume of distribution to 7-9 L/kg, showing that more
of the drug resides tissues than in plasma.3 Secondly, the extra-long alkyl group creates
enough steric hindrance to prevent efflux from the cell. Where tetracyclines would be removed, the
bulky tigecycline continues to work.
Thirdly, tigecycline shows five times more affinity to the 30S ribosome compared
to tetracycline.2 The
9-tert-butyl-glycylamido group shifts the orientation of tigecycline within the
30S ribosome and generates more stable hydrogen bond stacking, shielding the
molecule from TetM protective
proteins.7,8 The important glycylamido
addition to the minocycline backbone provides the biochemical opportunity for
the pharmacological improvements of tigecycline over minocycline and other
tetracyclines. Unfortunately, some
anaerobic bacteria have displayed resistance to tigecycline through the upregulation
of a different set of efflux pumps. Enterobacter and Acinetobacter increase the number of RND pumps on their membranes,
which are not blocked by the bulky side chain and remove tigecycline from the
cell.2
Interest
in tigecycline led to worldwide testing process as many countries sponsored
research into the effectiveness of tigecycline through the TEST Program
(Tigecycline Evaluation and Surveillance Trial). Tigecycline showed similar or improved
results to treatment by minocycline (the closest relative), to a vancomycin-azetrenam
combination, and to an imipenem-cilastatin combination. Specifically, tigecycline provides
hope to treat the various drug-resistant strains like vancomycin-resistant Enterococci (VRE), methicillin-resistant
Staphalococcus aureus (MRSA),
penicillin-resistant Streptococcus
pneumonia, and beta-lactamase producing E.
coli. However, the TEST program has
shown regional variations in the activities of tigecycline against resistant
bacteria and a growing resistance to tigecycline itself. The FDA approved tigecycline for the
treatment of complicated intra-abdominal infections, community-acquired
bacterial pneumonia, and complicated skin infections against a wide range of
species.3,4,9 The FDA Black Box Warning suggests a 0.6% increase in
morality risk and advises the use of tigecycline only when alternatives are not
available.9
Unsusceptible
to the normal methods of tetracycline resistance, tigecycline continues to
inhibit the 30S ribosomal subunit despite Tet efflux transporters or TetM proteins that protect the
accommodation site of the ribosome. Tigecycline demonstrates the creative
ability biochemistry provides to overcome bacterial resistance by building on
the structure of minocycline. Tigecycline’s bulky side chain generates the
improved characteristics of tigecycline.
At this point, tigecycline remains the only FDA approved glycycline and
offers a potent weapon against antibacterial resistance.
References
1. Projan S.
Preclinical pharmacology of GAR-936, a novel glycycline antibacterial agent. Pharmacotherapy.
2000;20(9):219-223.
2. Seputiene V,
Povilonis J, Armalyte J, Suziedelis K, Pavilonis A, Suziedeliene E. Tigecycline
- how powerful is it in the fight against antibiotic-resistant bacteria? Medicina
(Kaunas). 2010;46(4):240-248.
3.
Doan T, Fung H,
Mehta D, Riska P. Tigecycline: A glycylcyline antimicrobial agent. Clin
Thera. 2006;28(8):1079-1106.
4.
Peterson L. A
review of tigecycline - the first glycycline. International Journal of
Antimicrobial Agents. 2008;32(S4):S215-S222.
5.
Garrison M, Neumiller
J, Setter S. Tigecycline: An investigational glycycline antimicrobial with
activity against resistant gram-positive organisms. Clin Thera.
2005;27(1):12-22.
6.
Loh E,
Ellis-Grosse E, Petersen P, Sum P, Projan S. Tigecycline: A case study. Expert
Opin Drug Discov. 2007;2(3):403-418.
7.
Olson M, Ruzin
A, Feyfant E, Rush T, O'Connell J, Bradford P. Functional, biophysical, and
structural bases for antibacterial activity of tigecycline. Antimicrob
Agents Chemother. 2006;50(6):2156-2166.
8.
Jenner L, Starosta
A, Terry D, et al. Sturctural basis for potent inhibitory activity of the
antibiotic tigecycline during protein synthesis. PNAS.
2013;110(10):3812-3816.
9.
Tygacil [package
insert]. Philadelphia, PA: Wyeth Pharmaceuticals Inc; September 2013.
No comments:
Post a Comment